Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Therapy Guided by Measurable Residual Disease.

BACKGROUND: The combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) as compared with chemoimmunotherapy. Whether ibrutinib-venetoclax and personalization of treatment duration according to measurable residual disease (MRD) is more effective than fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab (FCR) is unclear. METHODS: In this phase 3, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label platform trial involving patients with untreated CLL, we compared ibrutinib-venetoclax and ibrutinib monotherapy with FCR. In the ibrutinib-venetoclax group, after 2 months of ibrutinib, venetoclax was added for up to 6 years of therapy. The duration of ibrutinib-venetoclax therapy was defined by MRD assessed in peripheral blood and bone marrow and was double the time taken to achieve undetectable MRD. The primary end point was progression-free survival in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group as compared with the FCR group, results that are reported here. Key secondary end points were overall survival, response, MRD, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 523 patients were randomly assigned to the ibrutinib-venetoclax group or the FCR group. At a median of 43.7 months, disease progression or death had occurred in 12 patients in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group and 75 patients in the FCR group (hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07 to 0.24; P<0.001). Death occurred in 9 patients in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group and 25 patients in the FCR group (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.67). At 3 years, 58.0% of the patients in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group had stopped therapy owing to undetectable MRD. After 5 years of ibrutinib-venetoclax therapy, 65.9% of the patients had undetectable MRD in the bone marrow and 92.7% had undetectable MRD in the peripheral blood. The risk of infection was similar in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group and the FCR group. The percentage of patients with cardiac serious adverse events was higher in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group than in the FCR group (10.7% vs. 0.4%). CONCLUSIONS: MRD-directed ibrutinib-venetoclax improved progression-free survival as compared with FCR, and results for overall survival also favored ibrutinib-venetoclax. (Funded by Cancer Research UK and others; FLAIR ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN01844152; EudraCT number, 2013-001944-76.).

Análisis de factores implicados en el desarrollo de respuesta humoral a la vacunación frente a SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes con enfermedad reumática en tratamiento biológico / Analysis of factors involved in the development of humoral response to vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with rheumatic pathology under biological treatment

Antecedentes y objetivo: En el contexto de la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2 el desarrollo de nuevas vacunas y su eficacia en pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas inmunomediadas ha sido motivo de estudio. El objetivo de este trabajo es evaluar la tasa de respuesta vacunal en pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas inmunomediadas en tratamiento con inmunomoduladores, incluyendo el rituximab (RTX), así como la influencia de posibles factores implicados en la respuesta vacunal en estos pacientes. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio de cohortes prospectivo, unicéntrico, en 130 pacientes con enfermedad reumática inmunomediada en tratamiento con inmunomoduladores, incluyendo RTX, que recibieron la pauta completa de vacunación frente a SARS-CoV-2 con BioNTech/Pfizer, Moderna/Lonza, AstraZeneca o Janssen entre abril y octubre de 2021. Se analizaron factores demográficos como la edad, el sexo, el tipo de enfermedad inmunomediada, el tratamiento inmunomodulador y el tipo de vacuna, así como marcadores serológicos incluyendo los niveles de anticuerpos anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG al mes y a los 6 meses desde la vacunación, niveles de linfocitos CD19+ y la presencia o no de hipogammaglobulinemia. Se realizó un análisis estadístico para evaluar la influencia en los títulos de anticuerpos de las diferentes variables recogidas en el estudio. Resultados: Se obtuvo una muestra de 130 pacientes, 41 en tratamiento con RTX y 89 con otros inmunomoduladores. Se observó una menor tasa de respuesta vacunal en los pacientes con RTX (12/34, 36,7%) al mes de la primovacunación con respecto al 96,5% (82/85) de pacientes que no recibieron este fármaco y sí alcanzaron respuesta. En el análisis de variables secundarias la hipogammaglobulinemia se asoció de forma significativa a la ausencia de desarrollo de respuesta vacunal. La administración del último RTX en los 6 meses previos a la vacunación y niveles bajos de CD19+ (<20mg/dl) también influyeron de forma negativa en el desarrollo de...(AU)

Background and objective: In the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the development of new vaccines and their efficacy in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases has been a target to investigate. The objective of this study is to evaluate the vaccine response rate in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases under treatment with immunomodulators, including rituximab (RTX), as well as the influence of possible factors involved in the vaccination response in these patients. Material and methods: A single-centre, prospective cohort study was conducted in 130 patients with immune-mediated rheumatic disease on treatment with immunomodulators, including RTX, who received the full course of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 with BioNTech/Pfizer, Moderna/Lonza, AstraZeneca, or Janssen between April and October 2021. Demographic factors such as age, sex, type of immune-mediated disease, immunomodulatory treatment and type of vaccine were analysed, as well as serological markers including anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels measured one and six months after vaccination, CD19+ lymphocyte levels and the presence or absence of hypogammaglobulinemia. A statistical analysis was performed to assess the influence of the different variables collected in the study on the antibody titres. Results: A sample of 130 patients was studied, 41 under treatment with RTX and 89 with other immunomodulators. A lower vaccination response rate was observed in patients with RTX (12/34, 36.7%) one month after the primary vaccination compared to 96.5% (82/85) of patients who did not receive this drug and did respond. In the analysis of secondary variables, hypogammaglobulinemia was significantly associated with lack of development of a vaccine response. The administration of the last RTX cycle in the 6 months prior to vaccination and low CD19+ levels (<20mg/dL) also had a negative influence on the development of a vaccine response...(AU)

Tratamiento del lupus eritematoso sistémico: nuevas opciones terapéuticas / Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: New therapeutic options

El lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES) es una enfermedad inflamatoria autoinmune sistémica de causa desconocida, con heterogeneidad en su presentación clínica, así como una variabilidad en su curso clínico y pronóstico. El objetivo actual del tratamiento es conseguir la remisión de la enfermedad o al menos un estado de baja actividad, y por consiguiente mejorar la calidad de vida del paciente. La terapia biológica en el lupus, a diferencia de otras entidades, si bien no ha conseguido instaurarse plenamente, ha irrumpido en los últimos años con novedades terapéuticas importantes. En esta revisión se pretende actualizar las herramientas terapéuticas del tratamiento del LES enfocado a las nuevas moléculas que han conseguido superar los objetivos de sus ensayos clínicos (AU)

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune inflammatory disease of unknown cause, with heterogeneity in its clinical presentation, as well as variability in its clinical course and prognosis. The current goal of treatment is to achieve disease remission or a state of low activity, and thereby improve the patient's quality of life. Biological therapy in lupus, unlike other entities, although it has not been fully established, in recent years it has burst onto the scene with important therapeutic novelties. This review aims to update the therapeutic tools for the treatment of SLE focusing on the new molecules that have achieved the objectives of their clinical trials (AU)

Phase 1b dose-finding study of rituximab, lenalidomide, and ibrutinib (R2I) in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare non-Hodgkin lymphoma that frequently becomes chemoresistant over time. The distinct mechanisms of ibrutinib and lenalidomide provided a judicious rationale to explore the combination with anti-CD20 immunotherapy. In this phase 1b study (NCT02446236), patients (n = 25) with relapsed/refractory MCL received rituximab with escalating doses of lenalidomide (days 1-21) and ibrutinib 560 mg (days 1-28) of 28-day cycles. The MTD for lenalidomide was 20 mg; most common grade ≥3 adverse events were skin rashes (32%) and neutropenic fever (24%). The best ORR was 88%, CR rate was 83%, and median duration of response (DOR) was 36.92 months (95% CI 33.77, 51.37). Responses were seen even in refractory patients or with high-risk features (e.g. blastoid variant, TP53 mutation, Ki-67 > 30%). R2I was safe and tolerable in patients with R/R MCL.

First-Line Venetoclax Combinations in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials of venetoclax plus anti-CD20 antibodies as first-line treatment in fit patients (i.e., those with a low burden of coexisting conditions) with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have been lacking. METHODS: In a phase 3, open-label trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, fit patients with CLL who did not have TP53 aberrations to receive six cycles of chemoimmunotherapy (fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab or bendamustine-rituximab) or 12 cycles of venetoclax-rituximab, venetoclax-obinutuzumab, or venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib. Ibrutinib was discontinued after two consecutive measurements of undetectable minimal residual disease or could be extended. The primary end points were undetectable minimal residual disease (sensitivity, <10-4 [i.e., <1 CLL cell in 10,000 leukocytes]) as assessed by flow cytometry in peripheral blood at month 15 and progression-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 926 patients were assigned to one of the four treatment regimens (229 to chemoimmunotherapy, 237 to venetoclax-rituximab, 229 to venetoclax-obinutuzumab, and 231 to venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib). At month 15, the percentage of patients with undetectable minimal residual disease was significantly higher in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group (86.5%; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 80.6 to 91.1) and the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group (92.2%; 97.5% CI, 87.3 to 95.7) than in the chemoimmunotherapy group (52.0%; 97.5% CI, 44.4 to 59.5; P<0.001 for both comparisons), but it was not significantly higher in the venetoclax-rituximab group (57.0%; 97.5% CI, 49.5 to 64.2; P = 0.32). Three-year progression-free survival was 90.5% in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group and 75.5% in the chemoimmunotherapy group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.32; 97.5% CI, 0.19 to 0.54; P<0.001). Progression-free survival at 3 years was also higher with venetoclax-obinutuzumab (87.7%; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.42; 97.5% CI, 0.26 to 0.68; P<0.001), but not with venetoclax-rituximab (80.8%; hazard ratio, 0.79; 97.5% CI, 0.53 to 1.18; P = 0.18). Grade 3 and grade 4 infections were more common with chemoimmunotherapy (18.5%) and venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib (21.2%) than with venetoclax-rituximab (10.5%) or venetoclax-obinutuzumab (13.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Venetoclax-obinutuzumab with or without ibrutinib was superior to chemoimmunotherapy as first-line treatment in fit patients with CLL. (Funded by AbbVie and others; GAIA-CLL13 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02950051; EudraCT number, 2015-004936-36.).

Plain Language Summary of the iNNOVATE study: ibrutinib plus rituximab is well-tolerated and effective in people with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This article provides a short summary of 5-year results from the iNNOVATE trial. The original paper was published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in October 2021. People with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) were randomly divided into two groups of 75 people each. One group received a combination treatment composed of two drugs, ibrutinib plus rituximab, and the other group took placebo ("sugar pill") plus rituximab. Ibrutinib (also known by the brand name Imbruvica®) is a drug that reduces cancer cells' ability to multiply and survive. Ibrutinib is an FDA-approved drug for the treatment of WM. Rituximab is a drug that helps the immune system find and kill cancer cells. Participants in the trial were treated and their health monitored for up to 5 years (63 months). WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: During the 5 years of monitoring, more people who took ibrutinib plus rituximab experienced an improvement in their disease and lived longer without their disease getting worse compared to those who took placebo plus rituximab. Side effects from ibrutinib and rituximab were manageable and generally decreased over time. Participants in both study groups reported improvements in quality of life, but those who took ibrutinib plus rituximab reported significantly greater improvement in their quality of life (as measured by FACT-An score) compared to those who took placebo plus rituximab. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: These results show that ibrutinib plus rituximab is better than rituximab alone in people with WM and that ibrutinib plus rituximab is safe and effective in the long term. This information confirms the role of ibrutinib plus rituximab as a standard of care for WM. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02165397 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Low-Dose Rituximab for Bullous Pemphigoid. Protocol and Single-Center Experience / Baja dosis de rituximab para penfigoide ampolloso. Protocolo y experiencia de un único centro

Background Low-dose rituximab is a protocol used in several autoimmune diseases, that has also shown to be effective and safe in pemphigus vulgaris. Objectives To study whether low-dose rituximab is also effective for bullous pemphigoid. Methods Patients with BP were treated with a single cycle of two infusions of rituximab 500 mg at an interval of 2 weeks. Early and late end points were monitored. Results Six patients, five males and a female, with a mean age of 78.6 years (range 65–89) and a mean history of BP of 6.7 months (range 2–16) were included. A rapid and marked response was observed after a single cycle of treatment, with a mean time to disease control and to end of consolidation phase of 1.9 (range 1–3), and 4 weeks (range 3–5), respectively. Four patients achieved a late end point at a mean of 15.75 weeks (range 13–20). Three of them achieved partial remission with no therapy (two patients) or with minimal therapy (one patient), and one of them achieved complete remission with no therapy. One patient has 6 weeks of clinical follow-up after rituximab administration. The remaining patient relapsed 4 weeks after the rituximab treatment, and remains in complete remission with more than minimal therapy. One patient had a herpetic gingivostomatitis related to rituximab. Conclusions Low-dose rituximab for BP achieved acceptable remission rates and steroid-sparing activity, with a better safety profile and a lower cost, compared to standard doses. This pilot study suggests that low-dose rituximab could be a therapeutic option for BP (AU)

Antecedentes La administración de dosis bajas de rituximab es un protocolo utilizado en diversas enfermedades autoinmunes, que ha demostrado también su eficacia y seguridad para el pénfigo vulgar. Objetivos Determinar si rituximab a dosis bajas es efectivo para el penfigoide ampolloso (PA). Métodos Se trató a los pacientes con PA con un ciclo único de 2 infusiones de rituximab 500 mg con un intervalo de 2 semanas. Se monitorizaron los puntos temprano y final tardío. Resultados Se incluyeron en el estudio 6 pacientes, 5 varones y una mujer, con una edad media de 78,6 años (rango: 65.89) e historia media de PA de 6,7 meses (rango: 2-16). Se observó una respuesta rápida y acusada tras un ciclo único de tratamiento, con un tiempo medio hasta el control de la enfermedad y el final de la fase de consolidación de 1,9 (rango: 1-3) y 4 semanas (rango: 3-5), respectivamente. Cuatro pacientes lograron un punto final tardío a una media de 15,75 semanas (rango: 13-20). Tres de ellos lograron una remisión parcial sin terapia (2 pacientes) o con terapia mínima (un paciente), logrando uno de ellos la remisión completa sin terapia. A un paciente se le realizó un seguimiento de 6 semanas tras la administración de rituximab. El paciente restante sufrió una recaída transcurridas 4 semanas del tratamiento de rituximab, permaneciendo en remisión completa con terapia mínima. Un paciente manifestó gingivoestomatitis herpética relacionada con rituximab. Conclusiones La administración de dosis bajas de rituximab para PA logró tasas de remisión aceptables y reducción de esteroides, con un mejor perfil de seguridad y un menor coste, en comparación con las dosis estándar. Este estudio piloto sugiere que la administración de bajas dosis de rituximab podría ser una opción terapéutica para el PA (AU)

[Artículo traducido] Baja dosis de rituximab para penfigoide ampolloso. Protocolo y experiencia de un único centro / Low-Dose Rituximab for Bullous Pemphigoid. Protocol and Single-Center Experience

Antecedentes La administración de dosis bajas de rituximab es un protocolo utilizado en diversas enfermedades autoinmunes, que ha demostrado también su eficacia y seguridad para el pénfigo vulgar. Objetivos Determinar si rituximab a dosis bajas es efectivo para el penfigoide ampolloso (PA). Métodos Se trató a los pacientes con PA con un ciclo único de 2 infusiones de rituximab 500 mg con un intervalo de 2 semanas. Se monitorizaron los puntos temprano y final tardío. Resultados Se incluyeron en el estudio 6 pacientes, 5 varones y una mujer, con una edad media de 78,6 años (rango: 65.89) e historia media de PA de 6,7 meses (rango: 2-16). Se observó una respuesta rápida y acusada tras un ciclo único de tratamiento, con un tiempo medio hasta el control de la enfermedad y el final de la fase de consolidación de 1,9 (rango: 1-3) y 4 semanas (rango: 3-5), respectivamente. Cuatro pacientes lograron un punto final tardío a una media de 15,75 semanas (rango: 13-20). Tres de ellos lograron una remisión parcial sin terapia (2 pacientes) o con terapia mínima (un paciente), logrando uno de ellos la remisión completa sin terapia. A un paciente se le realizó un seguimiento de 6 semanas tras la administración de rituximab. El paciente restante sufrió una recaída transcurridas 4 semanas del tratamiento de rituximab, permaneciendo en remisión completa con terapia mínima. Un paciente manifestó gingivoestomatitis herpética relacionada con rituximab. Conclusiones La administración de dosis bajas de rituximab para PA logró tasas de remisión aceptables y reducción de esteroides, con un mejor perfil de seguridad y un menor coste, en comparación con las dosis estándar. Este estudio piloto sugiere que la administración de bajas dosis de rituximab podría ser una opción terapéutica para el PA (AU)

Background Low-dose rituximab is a protocol used in several autoimmune diseases, that has also shown to be effective and safe in pemphigus vulgaris. Objectives To study whether low-dose rituximab is also effective for bullous pemphigoid. Methods Patients with BP were treated with a single cycle of two infusions of rituximab 500 mg at an interval of 2 weeks. Early and late end points were monitored. Results Six patients, five males and a female, with a mean age of 78.6 years (range 65–89) and a mean history of BP of 6.7 months (range 2–16) were included. A rapid and marked response was observed after a single cycle of treatment, with a mean time to disease control and to end of consolidation phase of 1.9 (range 1–3), and 4 weeks (range 3–5), respectively. Four patients achieved a late end point at a mean of 15.75 weeks (range 13–20). Three of them achieved partial remission with no therapy (two patients) or with minimal therapy (one patient), and one of them achieved complete remission with no therapy. One patient has 6 weeks of clinical follow-up after rituximab administration. The remaining patient relapsed 4 weeks after the rituximab treatment, and remains in complete remission with more than minimal therapy. One patient had a herpetic gingivostomatitis related to rituximab. Conclusions Low-dose rituximab for BP achieved acceptable remission rates and steroid-sparing activity, with a better safety profile and a lower cost, compared to standard doses. This pilot study suggests that low-dose rituximab could be a therapeutic option for BP (AU)

Ibrutinib plus Bendamustine and Rituximab in Untreated Mantle-Cell Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, may have clinical benefit when administered in combination with bendamustine and rituximab and followed by rituximab maintenance therapy in older patients with untreated mantle-cell lymphoma. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients 65 years of age or older to receive ibrutinib (560 mg, administered orally once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects) or placebo, plus six cycles of bendamustine (90 mg per square meter of body-surface area) and rituximab (375 mg per square meter). Patients with an objective response (complete or partial response) received rituximab maintenance therapy, administered every 8 weeks for up to 12 additional doses. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by the investigators. Overall survival and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Among 523 patients, 261 were randomly assigned to receive ibrutinib and 262 to receive placebo. At a median follow-up of 84.7 months, the median progression-free survival was 80.6 months in the ibrutinib group and 52.9 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.59 to 0.96; P = 0.01). The percentage of patients with a complete response was 65.5% in the ibrutinib group and 57.6% in the placebo group (P = 0.06). Overall survival was similar in the two groups. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events during treatment was 81.5% in the ibrutinib group and 77.3% in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Ibrutinib treatment in combination with standard chemoimmunotherapy significantly prolonged progression-free survival. The safety profile of the combined therapy was consistent with the known profiles of the individual drugs. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development and Pharmacyclics; SHINE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01776840.).

Improved Efficacy of Tafasitamab plus Lenalidomide versus Systemic Therapies for Relapsed/Refractory DLBCL: RE-MIND2, an Observational Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: In RE-MIND2 (NCT04697160), patient-level outcomes from the L-MIND study (NCT02399085) of tafasitamab plus lenalidomide were retrospectively compared with patient-level matched observational cohorts treated with National Cancer Care Network (NCCN)/European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)-listed systemic therapies for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected from health records of eligible patients aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed DLBCL who had received ≥2 systemic therapies for DLBCL (including ≥1 anti-CD20 therapy). Patients from L-MIND were matched with patients from the RE-MIND2 observational cohort using estimated propensity score-based 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching, balanced for nine covariates. The primary analysis compared tafasitamab plus lenalidomide with patients who received any systemic therapy for R/R DLBCL (pooled in one cohort) or bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) or rituximab plus gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (R-GemOx; as two distinct cohorts). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included treatment response and time-to-event outcomes. RESULTS: In RE-MIND2, 3,454 patients were enrolled from 200 sites in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. Strictly matched pairs of patients consisted of tafasitamab plus lenalidomide versus systemic therapies pooled (n = 76 pairs), versus BR (n = 75 pairs), and versus R-GemOx (n = 74 pairs). Significantly prolonged OS was reported with tafasitamab plus lenalidomide versus systemic pooled therapies [hazard ratios (HR): 0.55; P = 0.0068], BR (HR: 0.42; P < 0.0001), and R-GemOx (HR: 0.47; P = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: RE-MIND2, a retrospective observational study, met its primary endpoint, demonstrating prolonged OS with tafasitamab plus lenalidomide versus BR and R-GemOx. See related commentary by Cherng and Westin, p. 3908.

Extending Treatment Intervals of R-CHOP Therapy Might Be Acceptable for Some Patients with Non-indolent Non-Hodgkin's B-cell Lymphoma.

R-CHOP therapy is generally performed every 3 weeks. We investigated the effects of extending the interval of R-CHOP therapy for > 1 week on the prognoses of patients with non-indolent non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma. Among the 338 patients with non-indolent non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma who received initial chemotherapy at our institution, we focused on 178 patients who received R-CHOP therapy and analyzed the outcomes of the patients stratified by the treatment intervals. The estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) for the entire population was 82.1%. Patients treated at intervals of ≥ 4 weeks were significantly older, and they had significantly longer follow-up periods and lower relative dose intensity. But the estimated 3-year OS was comparable to those treated at <4 weeks (83.3% vs. 80.5% p=0.947). In a multivariate analysis, age and the dose of anti-cancer agents had significant impacts on OS, but there was no significant relationship regarding the treatment intervals. Propensity score matching confirmed the same result. R-CHOP therapy every around 4 weeks could achieve relatively good survival in some selected patients with non-indolent non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma.

Rituximab in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a phase I trial.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) remains challenging. Preclinical studies revealed that B cell depletion could modulate the microenvironment and overcome chemoresistance. We conducted a phase I study to evaluate the feasibility and safety of B cell depletion using the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab to treat HNSCC. METHODS: Ten patients were enrolled in two protocols. The first four patients treated using protocol 1 received rituximab 1000 mg on days -14 and -7, followed by gemcitabine/cisplatin every 3 weeks, and rituximab was administered every 6 months thereafter. Because of disease hyperprogression, protocol 1 was amended to protocol 2, which consisted of the concomitant administration of rituximab 375 mg/m2 and gemcitabine/cisplatin every 3 weeks. Another six patients were enrolled and treated using protocol 2. RESULTS: Three patients treated using protocol 1 exhibited rapid disease progression, and the remaining patient could not undergo evaluation after rituximab treatment. Conversely, no unpredicted harm was observed in the six patients treated using protocol 2. Among these patients, one achieved complete response, and two had partial responses. The disease-free durations in these patients were 7.0, 6.2, and 7.1 months, respectively. Immune cell analysis revealed a higher ratio of cytotoxic T cells to regulatory T cells in responders than in non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: B cell depletion using rituximab alone in patients with HNSCC can cause hyperprogressive disease. Contrarily, the co-administration of rituximab and cisplatin/gemcitabine was feasible and safe. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04361409 , 24 April 2020, retrospectively registered.

Follicular Lymphoma: a Focus on Current and Emerging Therapies

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent lymphoma and is characterized by a relapsing and remitting course. In addition to significant biologic heterogeneity, the clinical trajectory for patients is variable, with some being observed for many years, and others having aggressive disease requiring multiple treatment courses. Unfortunately, FL remains incurable, and continues to cause early mortality. Improved understanding of the genetic and immune biology of FL has led to several FDA-approved therapies in the relapsed and refractory setting, including PI3K inhibitors; immunomodulatory agents; the EZH2 inhibitor, tazemetostat; and anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, axicabtagene ciloleucel. This review outlines the current approach to the diagnosis and treatment of FL with a focus on emerging investigational therapies, including targeted protein inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, and novel combination strategies.

Clinical features, investigations, and outcomes of pediatric limbic encephalitis: A multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical presentation, investigations, management, and disease course in pediatric autoimmune limbic encephalitis (LE). METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, from the UK Childhood Neuroinflammatory Disease network, we identified children from six tertiary centers with LE <18 years old between 2008 and 2021. Clinical and paraclinical data were retrieved from medical records. RESULTS: Twenty-five children fulfilling LE criteria were identified, with median age of 11 years (IQR 8, 14) and median follow-up of 24 months (IQR 18, 48). All children presented with seizures; 15/25 (60%) were admitted to intensive care. Neuroimaging demonstrated asymmetric mesial temporal changes in 8/25 (32%), and extra-limbic changes with claustrum involvement in 9/25 (38%). None were positive for LGI1/CASPR2 antibodies (Abs), 2/25 were positive for serum anti-NMDAR Abs, and 2/15 positive for anti-Hu Abs; one died from relapsing neuroblastoma. Two children had serum and CSF anti-GAD antibodies. Initial immune therapy included steroids in 23/25 (92%), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in 14/25 (56%), and plasma exchange in 7/25 (28%). The commonest second-line treatment was rituximab in 15/25 (60%). Median duration of hospital admission was 21 days (IQR 11, 30). At last follow-up, 13/25 (52%) had refractory seizures and 16/25 (64%) had memory impairment. Six children (24%) had modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores ≥3. There was no significant difference in mRS, or long-term cognitive and epilepsy outcomes in those who received rituximab versus those who did not. INTERPRETATION: A diagnosis of autoimmune LE was associated with significant morbidity and adverse outcomes in this pediatric cohort.

Clinical Efficacy of Bendamustine Plus Rituximab (BR) for B-cell Relevant Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Role of ß2-MG in Predicting the Efficacy of BR Regimen: A Real-World Retrospective Study in China.

BACKGROUND: Domestic bendamustine has been approved for appearing on the market in China in the past two years. The report on bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in the treatment of Chinese B-cell-associated indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL) has not yet been published. This study probed into clinical efficacy of the BR regimen for B-cell-associated iNHL in China as well as the value of ß2-microglobulin (ß2-MG) as a prognostic factor. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 73 B-cell-associated iNHL patients who received BR treatment in The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University from January 2020 to January 2021, including clinical characteristics, therapies, therapeutic efficacy, and prognosis-related factors. Thirty-three patients (45.2%) did not receive any other treatment before the BR regimen, and other patients received CHOP, R-CHOP, and other regimens in the past. The cutoff date for follow-up was May 2021. Clinical characteristics of patients were analyzed. The clinical efficacy of the BR regimen was evaluated. Differences of ß2-MG expression before and after treatment were analyzed between the CR+PR group and the SD+PD group. Main outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A multivariate Cox regression model was taken to analyze prognostic factors relative to survival rate of patients, and adverse events (AEs) during treatment. RESULTS: The objective response rate (ORR) of B-cell-associated iNHL patients who received BR regimen as first-/multiline treatment was 79.5%, with complete response (CR) of 37.0%, partial response (PR) of 42.5%, median PFS of 12.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 10.9-13.2), and median OS of 15.5 months (95% CI: 14.8-16.1). Before treatment, there was no statistical significance in the ß2-MG level between the CR+PR group and the SD+PD group (p > 0.05). After treatment, the ß2-MG level in the CR group was noticeably lower than that in the SD+PD group (p < 0.05). The ß2-MG level in the CR+PR group decreased conspicuously after treatment (p < 0.05). The ß2-MG level in the SD+PD group after treatment was not notably different from that before treatment (p > 0.05). According to the median expression level of ß2-MG before treatment, patients were divided into two groups. The average PFS of the low expression group was 12.69 ± 0.77 months, which was longer than the high expression group (10.13 ± 0.74 months), but the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that B-cell-associated iNHL subtype was the independent prognostic marker most likely to affect PFS of patients (p = 0.051). Incidence of any grade of AEs in all patients was 32.9% (24/73). CONCLUSION: B-cell-associated iNHL patients who received BR regimen had favorable clinical efficacy and were tolerable to AEs. Though the ß2-MG level in this study could not be used to predict clinical outcome, a lower level before treatment seemed to be implicated in better survival outcomes of patients. Our research also unraveled that B-cell-associated iNHL subtype may be a key factor to patient's prognosis. Overall, this study offers some important insights into clinical application of the BR regimen for Chinese B-cell-associated iNHL patients.

Assessing the transition from intravenous to subcutaneous delivery of rituximab: Benefits for payers, health care professionals, and patients with lymphoma.

Subcutaneous (SC) administration of rituximab provides an opportunity for reduced patient treatment burden and increased healthcare efficiencies as an alternative to intravenous (IV) rituximab. There is minimal evidence comparing costs associated with SC and IV rituximab in a US setting. This research assessed the impact of transitioning patients from IV to SC rituximab for treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) from the US payer, provider, and patient perspective. We developed a model to estimate cost differences for transitioning 20% of a patient cohort from IV to SC rituximab. We included patients with incident diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, incident and recurrent follicular lymphoma, and incident and recurrent chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In the model, each patient received the same number of doses and that there was no difference in discontinuation between cohorts due to non-inferior efficacy and a similar safety profile. Model inputs were collected from published literature and publicly available data. Scenario analyses tested the impact of availability of low-cost biosimilars. In the base case (1,000,000 covered lives), we estimated a total of 157 patients, with 769 total drug administrations. A transition of 20% of patients from IV to SC was projected to generate $153,000 in payer savings, increase provider capacity by 270 hours, and free 470 hours of patient time. Scenario analyses suggest SC administration will be cost saving for payers even with a market where biosimilars approach 50% market share. A 20% transition to SC rituximab in a single cohort of patients has the potential to generate significant US health system value in the form of payer savings, increased practice capacity, and patient time.

Rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in PM/Scl antibody-associated disease: case-based review.

Autoantibodies to the 75-kDa and 100-kDa subunits of the PM/Scl nucleolar protein complex are associated with an overlap syndrome, manifesting with clinical features of systemic sclerosis and idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. We describe the diverse clinical features in a series of 4 cases with anti-PM/Scl-75 and/or anti-PM/Scl-100 antibodies, including severe proximal muscle weakness, oesophageal dysfunction, respiratory weakness requiring mechanical ventilation, Raynaud's, calcinosis cutis, sclerodactyly and critical digital ischaemia. Despite the severity of striated and oesophageal muscle weakness, all patients responded very well to immune suppression, and calcinosis cutis in one case regressed substantially. We highlight the efficacy of Rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin therapy (IVIg) in these cases, enabling return to normal muscle function within six months. Rituximab was preferentially chosen for cases with hyper-gammaglobulinemia and multiple autoantibodies in addition to anti-PM/Scl, and IVIg was utilised for cases where a rapid onset of effect was required, such as severe ventilator-dependent respiratory muscle weakness and oesophageal dysfunction.